Analytics & value-based care
Orthopedics Analytics Software
See why orthopedic revenue moves: case mix, site of service, payer behavior and surgeon productivity, traced to the claim.
Orthopedics Analytics Software measures how an orthopedic group performs and explains why the numbers change. It tracks surgical volume by procedure, surgeon and site, work RVUs, payer mix, denial causes and ancillary margin. It compares results with past periods and specialty benchmarks, and it lets leaders trace any trend back to the claims behind it.


Analytics in a Orthopedics Practice
Orthopedic analytics starts with case mix. A drop in collections may come from fewer total joints, from joints moving from the hospital to the ASC, or from one payer cutting a rate. The system breaks revenue down by CPT code, surgeon, facility and place of service, so the cause shows up. It tracks work RVUs per surgeon against Medicare values, which helps with pay plans and staffing. Denials are grouped by CARC code, so a rise in global-period denials or modifier errors is clear within the period it starts. Ancillary lines, such as imaging, physical therapy, injections and DME, are measured on their own margin. Workers' compensation and auto cases are tracked as their own payer mix segment, since they pay on other schedules. National benchmarks show how each measure compares with other specialty practices. Each figure links to the claims behind it.
Why Is Analytics Different in Orthopedics?
Orthopedic revenue depends on a small number of high-value procedures, so small shifts matter. Medicare now pays for total knee and total hip replacement in the ASC, and many groups are moving cases there. That move changes the professional rate, the facility revenue and the cost of each case. Leaders need analytics that show the site-of-service differential by procedure, not just a total that went up or down.
Surgeon productivity is another core question. Orthopedic groups often pay surgeons on work RVUs or collections, and global surgical packages mean much of the work happens in follow-up visits that earn nothing extra. Counting 99024 post-op visits beside surgical RVUs shows how much clinic time each surgeon spends inside global periods. That helps the group plan clinic templates and physician assistant time.
Analytics should explain, not just report. A regular orthopedic reporting package tells leaders what happened. Analytics shows why: which payer, which code, which site and which surgeon drove the change. Good orthopedic dashboards then put those answers in front of the right people.
What Orthopedics Analytics Software Handles
- Total joints in the ASC (CPT 27447 and 27130)
- Total knee and total hip replacement are on the Medicare ASC covered procedures list. Analytics compares volume, payment and margin for these codes in the ASC versus the hospital. (CMS ASC Payment Rates: Addenda (covered procedures list))
- Work RVUs from the Medicare fee schedule
- Each surgeon's work RVUs are counted from the Medicare RVU file for the codes billed. Productivity can then be compared across surgeons and sites on the same basis. (CMS Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value Files)
- Place of service 11, 22 and 24
- Volume and payment are split by place of service, such as office, outpatient hospital and ASC. That shows how facility and non-facility rates change the revenue for each procedure. (CMS Place of Service Code Set)
- Denial causes by CARC code
- Denials are grouped by reason code, such as CARC 97 for bundled services and CARC 4 for modifier problems. Trends show which causes are rising and where in the cycle they start. (X12 Claim Adjustment Reason Codes)
- CPT 99024 post-op visit counts
- Visits billed with 99024 are counted by surgeon. Leaders see how much clinic time goes to global-period follow-up that earns no separate payment. (CMS MLN Global Surgery Booklet)
How Does Orthopedics Analytics Software Work?
1. Bring the data together
Claims, remits, schedules and charges feed one data layer. Clinical and billing data share the same patient, case and date keys.
2. Set the measures
The group picks the measures it runs on, such as collections per case, denial rate by payer and work RVUs per surgeon. Each one has a clear, written definition.
3. Compare over time
Each measure is shown against prior periods and the same period last year. Shifts stand out without a manual spreadsheet merge.
4. Benchmark
Measures are compared with regional and national specialty figures. Gaps point to where the group is falling behind.
5. Drill to the cause
Any number can be broken down by payer, code, site and surgeon. The claims behind it are one click away.
6. Feed the fix back
When a denial trend points to a coding rule, the fix goes into the claim scrubber. The next period shows whether it worked.
Orthopedics Analytics Software vs. Generic Software
| Area | Generic approach | Unlimited Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Case mix | Total collections with no procedure detail. | Volume and payment by CPT code, surgeon and site. |
| Site of service | ASC and hospital cases blended together. | Margin compared by place of service for each procedure. |
| Surgeon productivity | Collections per surgeon from a monthly export. | Work RVUs and post-op visit counts on one view. |
| Denial trends | A single denial rate for the whole group. | Causes grouped by CARC code, payer and surgeon. |
| Benchmarks | None, or an old survey. | Regional and national specialty comparisons. |
Who Uses It in a Orthopedics Practice
- Physician owner: A clear view of which procedures, sites and payers drive the group's results, with the claims behind each number.
- Practice administrator: Trends in volume, denials and productivity that show where to act first, compared with benchmarks.
- ASC director: Case volume and margin for total joints and other procedures moving from the hospital, by surgeon and payer.
Orthopedics Analytics Software FAQs
Orthopedic analytics should measure surgical volume by procedure and site, work RVUs per surgeon, collections per case, payer mix, denial causes and the margin on ancillary services. It should also show trends over time and compare them with specialty benchmarks. Each measure should link back to the claims behind it, so leaders can see why it changed.
The system compares total knee and hip cases in the ASC with those in the hospital. It shows the professional payment, the facility payment and the case cost for each site. Leaders can see how the shift changes revenue by surgeon and payer, and whether ASC cases are more or less profitable after implant costs.
Surgeon productivity is tracked with work RVUs from the Medicare fee schedule, so every surgeon is measured on the same basis. Post-op visits billed with 99024 are counted beside the RVUs. That shows how much clinic time each surgeon spends on follow-up care inside global periods, which a collections total would miss.
Denials are grouped by CARC code, payer, surgeon and procedure. When one cause starts to rise, such as bundled-service denials on post-op visits or modifier errors on multi-procedure cases, it shows up in the trend. Staff can open the denied claims behind the trend and send the fix upstream to coding or the scrubber.
Benchmarking compares the group's measures with regional and national specialty figures, such as collection rates, denial rates and payment timing. It points to where the group is ahead and where it lags. Benchmarks sit beside the group's own trends, so leaders can tell a market change from a problem inside the practice.
Workers' compensation and auto cases are tracked as their own payer group. Their volume, payment and AR are shown apart from health plan results, since they follow state fee schedules and slower payment cycles. That keeps a rise in injury cases from hiding a change in health plan performance, or the other way around.
Related Orthopedics Software
Analytics & value-based care
In the revenue cycle
Analytics for related specialties
Sources
GET STARTED
See Unlimited Systems in Action
Whether you're actively evaluating new technology or simply preparing for your next vendor renewal, Unlimited Systems can help you understand where your current workflows may be creating avoidable revenue risk.


